Soon after President Trump was discharged from the hospital after being treated for COVID-19 he tweeted the slur “Chinese virus” to refer to the coronavirus, something he’s oft repeated during the pandemic.
It’s the latest example of Trump’s alarming language that critics charge is xenophobic, discriminatory and even white supremacist. While Trump denies those labels, he has increasingly returned to the issue of race in the runup to the November election.
….invincible hero, who not only survived every dirty trick the Democrats threw at him, but the Chinese virus as well. He will show America we no longer have to be afraid.” @MirandaDevine @NYPost Thank you Miranda. Was over until the Plague came in from China. Will win anyway!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 5, 2020
Last month he barred racial sensitivity training for federal workers and then expanded it to contractors in an executive order. At the first debate last month, to an international audience, he called the trainings — aimed at creating an inclusive work environment — “racist.”
He’s also attacked The New York Times’ 1619 project — a project some schools are adopting into their curriculum to center the consequences of slavery in U.S. history — as anti-American propaganda. Then he formed the 1776 commission for a “patriotic” education.
And Trump paints
the largely peaceful protests for racial justice across the country as violent riots and tries to portray himself as the “law and order” candidate.
The president’s language and policy changes over the last month are less blips and more features of his reelection campaign, said Ange-Marie Hancock Alfaro, a professor of political science and gender studies at the University of Southern California.
“Part of the strategy is to create enough chaos and confusion and to create enough anger, frankly, in his base that they will make sure that they continue to kind of agitate during the electoral process,” Alfaro said.
“Based on what happened in 2016, he and his campaign see this as a successful strategy. I think what’s different in 2020, though, is that you can’t just do the same thing that you did four years ago. You actually have to amp it up.”
Alfaro said Trump is stoking racial tensions and playing on fears among some white voters in order to portray himself as the one who can save them from the chaos.
She pointed to a rally last month Bemidji, Minn., where Trump falsely claimed former Vice President Joe Biden would flood the majority-white state with refugees from “Somalia and all over the planet.”
Then to the almost exclusively white crowd he invoked the “racehorse theory.”
“You have good genes, you know that right? You have good genes. A lot of it’s about the genes isn’t it? Don’t you believe?” he told the crowd. “The racehorse theory you think was so different? You have good genes, Minnesota.”
That theory is a discredited, discriminatory belief from the eugenics movement that some genes are superior to others. These are the theories that shaped Nazi Germany’s policies. Eugenics was also behind the forced sterilization of women in the 1950s in North Carolina through the early 1970s in Puerto Rico. The pseudo-science led to the coerced sterilizations of Native American, Latina, African American and poor women.
“Then now, most recently, we started to hear reports of women in detention, in ICE detention, who were being sterilized without informed consent and certainly against their will,” she said.
Even if Trump loses to Biden in November, Alfaro said, his actions have normalized racist fringe ideologies and encouraged extremists.
“There’s been this emboldening of violence, this emboldening of a certain kind of rhetoric that I think really could become a problem,” she said. “So even if there is a peaceful transfer of power in January, we do have to be very concerned about the legacy of what we’ve seen over the past four years.”
There already appears to be a chilling effect as a result of Trump’s executive order to “combat offensive and anti-American race and sex stereotyping and scapegoating.”
This week actor William Jackson Harper tweeted about his experience with a nonprofit he works with, Arts In the Armed Forces. He said the organization asked him to choose a film for cadets of all academies to virtually screen and discuss. They settled on Malcolm X.
In addition to barring racial sensitivity training, the order also instructed
“This executive order denies the very real experiences of so many minorities in this country. This executive order is rooted in the fictitious idea that the scourges of racism and sexism are essentially over, and that the poisonous fallout from centuries discrimination isn’t real,” he wrote on Twitter. “But all of these things are real, and they remain to this day some of the most salient malignancies in our society.”
Harper called it “selective censorship.”
I believe that the selective censorship of certain chapters of our country’s because we find it disquieting, or because it disrupts our narrative and tarnishes our self-image, is cowardly at best, dangerous at worst, and dishonest either way.
— William Jackson Harper (@dubjackharper) October 5, 2020
“It’s no accident that all of these kinds of flagrant comments, which feel really spontaneous, they all cohere around a narrative of elevating white Americans as the real Americans and around excluding those who don’t fit into that as unworthy or unequal,” said Natalia Mehlman Petrzela, a New York-based historian of contemporary politics and culture.
She points to what she calls the whitewashing of America’s history through attacking efforts to teach about systemic racism.
“It’s about dismissing the idea that racism is real,” Petrzela said, calling it a strategic attack “on the idea that we must take seriously the experiences of people of color and the exclusion and racism that they have faced as a defining aspect of American society.”
M.E. Hart’s an attorney who’s conducted hundreds of racial sensitivity trainings for the federal government and American businesses. He said maligning efforts to create inclusive environments feels dangerous.
“The trainings are designed to help people understand and work better across cultures, to help people to create a culture of psychological safety and belonging so people can bring their best to work,” he said. “They’re not anti-American, they’re pro-American, pro-business.”
Hart was diplomatic prior to the presidential debate last week. But after watching President Trump choose not to condemn white supremacy during the televised event and then again attack mail-in voting as fraudulent with zero evidence, Hart’s diplomatic tone disappeared.
“The president laid down the gauntlet, and I’m concerned for the safety of American citizens, regardless of race, of gender, ethnicity,” Hart said. “Every American should be concerned when our president is using race to divide us.”
Critics Accuse Trump Of Using Race To Divide Americans /p>